Middle East Studies Profs. Still Peddling Peaceful Jihad
My latest Campus Watch blog post looks at academic obfuscation when it comes to the concept of jihad and contrasts it with Islam scholar Robert Spencer's enlightening speech on the subject at Stanford University earlier this month:
In his 2002 Commentary article, "Jihad and the Professors," Middle East Forum director Daniel Pipes makes a compelling case for "the nearly universal falsification of jihad on the part of American academic scholars." Rather than acknowledging the aggressively military nature of jihad (otherwise known as "holy war"), such academics would have us believe that it consists either of defensive warfare, a struggle for spiritual and personal improvement, or the promotion of social justice. Here are a few of the quotes he cites in the article:Continue reading "Middle East Studies Profs. Still Peddling Peaceful Jihad"
Jihad as "usually understood" means "a struggle to be true to the will of God and not holy war."
Dell DeChant, professor of world religions, University of South Florida
"…in the struggle to be a good Muslim, there may be times where one will be called upon to defend one's faith and community. Then [jihad] can take on the meaning of armed struggle."
John Esposito, founding director of the Prince Alwaleed bin Talal Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding, Georgetown University
Jihad is "resisting apartheid or working for women's rights."
Farid Eseck, professor of Islamic studies, Auburn Seminary
Six years later, it would be nice to conclude that the situation has changed. But the academic apologists inhabiting the field of Middle East studies continue the obfuscation. The following is just a sampling of the sort of misleading and, in some cases, deceptive definitions of jihad these professors have been peddling:
"It is clear that military warfare is the lesser jihad, and the greater jihad is against the forces that prevent human beings from being human, as it were."
Mary Richardson, professor of history, Tufts University (source: Tufts Journal)
Update (4/30): Robert Spencer explores the true meaning of jihad at Human Events. His article comes in response to three federal agencies' recent edict to personnal to avoid the terms, "jihadist" or "jihad" in discussing Islamic terrorism. It seems our government and our nation's Middle East studies professors have something in common.